Unlawfully, a lady who had previously self-excluded from all commercial gaming businesses in the commonwealth was given entrance to Harrah’s Philadelphia Casino.
A security officer looks over the casino floor at Harrah’s Philadelphia. According to the Pennsylvania State Police, a prohibited person was permitted to bet at a Caesars Entertainment establishment last month. (Photo by Casino.org)
A 59-year-old lady from Ridley Park, which is less than two miles from Harrah’s, was able to pass past security at the Caesars Entertainment casino despite being on the state’s self-exclusion list, according to information from the Bureau of Gaming Enforcement of the Pennsylvania State Police.
The woman allegedly continued playing slots in the early morning hours of August 26 according to law enforcement. The woman apparently struck a slot machine jackpot at 12:22 EST. She attempted to leave the premises without collecting the money, but since she is on the self-exclusion list and is therefore not permitted to be on a casino floor.
On her way out, casino security caught up with her and found out she was a forbidden person. State police declined to say how much the jackpot was or exactly when the woman made the decision to stop gambling in Pennsylvania.
Chester’s suburbs are home to Harrah’s Philadelphia. VICI Properties, a real estate investment trust owned by Caesars, is the owner of the casino. There are 1,700 slots, more than 100 tables games, and a Caesars Sportsbook on the 100,000-square-foot gaming floor.
Game-responsible measures
Every state that has legalized commercial gambling has put in place a variety of initiatives and tools to support responsible gambling. As for responsible gaming, self-exclusion is a key component.
The Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (PGCB) claimed that self-exclusion “allows a person to request to be barred from legalized gaming activities within a casino and offsite venues, online, at video gaming terminal (VGT) enterprises, or on fantasy contests. People who sign up for self-exclusion are forbidden from collecting winnings, making up losses, or accepting freebies, services, or anything else of value from a licensee or operator.
The Pennsylvanian who enrolls for exclusion chooses the duration of their prohibition. According to state police, the 59-year-old who was improperly allowed entry into Harrah’s Casino chose a lifetime ban.
Harrah’s Philadelphia’s regulatory violation will probably result in the PGCB fining the casino.
The PGCB fined Live! Casino Pittsburgh $7,500 during the July meeting of the gaming watchdog for letting a self-excluded person inside. In that event, a self-excluded person was given both permission to play at a table game and a cash advance from the cashier cage of the casino.
According to PGCB laws, a casino must recognize self-excluded customers and deny them access to gaming privileges and other gambling-related services, like check cashing or cash advances.
Self-Exclusion Secrets
Self-exclusion lists are normally kept private and out of the public eye, unlike casino black lists, which entail state regulators prohibiting those who are known bad actors from gambling.
The PGCB maintains the self-exclusion list and only provides the Rolodex to its licensed casinos and gaming operators.
While the ban applies only to casinos inside Pennsylvania, some companies like Penn Entertainment maintain a company self-exclusion list across all of its properties. For example, the woman involved in the Harrah’s incident supposedly wouldn’t have access to Penn Entertainment casinos in Pennsylvania, nor its casinos anywhere else in the US.
Paraphrased from the post Harrah’s Philadelphia Casino Jackpot Won by Self-Excluded Individual appeared first on Casino.org.
Leave a Reply